Then there may be an early version of Atlanta if we're lucky, that song was supposedly written and recorded at the end / during mixing of the TM sessions.
I would be weirded out to hear that on a Tiny Music compilation instead of a No. 4 re-issue.....
They also recorded all their shows from those tours if I'm not mistaken, but I don't think any of those recordings have ever been mixed or mastered for release -- ready-to-go stuff like that (New Haven, 1994) seems to be what these releases gravitate towards.
STP's camp could've taken a nod from the Pearl Jam way of releasing material there. I know that Pearl Jam has that sort of modified, weird, off-shoot fanbase that is similar to the Phish or the Dave Matthews band that they can release entire catalogs of live concerts to. STP doesn't have that culture but they could've sold live concert releases maybe through a subscription service or something.
I'm not a fan of remasters myself. I haven't found that the ones for Core or Purple really made me appreciate the music more than the original releases. For me, they are classics and don't need any change.
And I appreciate this point. Listening to Core and Purple remastered for any sort of listening-
epiphany-experience is pointless. But I think the
main reasons for remastering on these sets was to get a great sound out of the vinyl moreso than the new CD.
But on the other hand, Tiny Music and No. 4 are the perfect excuses for a remaster. I mean - for the other long-time-fans here - does anyone else have the memory that you could follow a distinct reduction in fidelity or clearness across the STP catalog with each release that peaked with No. 4? Tiny Music and No. 4 could both come out of this sounding like absolute gems if they transform those into cleaner sounding albums more akin to the production on Core.
A band can sound "artsy" in interviews when they say "well we did
this and that to capture that sort of 1970's crunchy rock sound with this and that amplifier and mic" but all of that artsy shit is meaningless if your album basically sounds like shit. You've got a band like Korn spending record amounts of money on production that does nothing for their catalog, but STP recorded albums "with towels over their mics" (I'm just trying to express a description of the sound by saying that). Now by contrast - keep this in mind but now go back and listen to "Hazy Daze" on STP. That is a track that had that 70's fuzz to it yet was recorded and released with great fidelity and clarity whereby the "artstyness" of the 70's fuzz not only didn't suffer, but translated very well into a clear, modern recording. Another track where it works is "Ride The Cliche" - I wouldn't change much about the way that one was presented because the fuzz that follows Weiland's vocals sort of serves the song. If anything, if they were going to work on that one I'd change it completely and go for complete and utter "in the room high-fi" clarity to see what happens to the song.
They reissue everything under the sun these days, and No.4 and SLDD have never had a proper vinyl release, barring the MOV releases which were not remasters and sound no better than the CDs to me.
They don't. Actually in most cases the whole "vinyl sounds better" thing is a bit of a snob-myth. Not always, but in most cases CD's actually sound better. The only format that I've truly experienced a regular significant enhancement of quality with was DVD-Audio which now has become stuff like "HD Tracks"....
I'm no expert but if No.4 just sounds bad because they tried to make it louder at the mastering stage, could it be cheaply fixed? It's not like it would need remixing necessarily.
I mean.... I don't know. No. 4 is a mess of shit sound quality. Even "Sour Girl" - the most pop-oriented song on the album - sounds like a 1930's record when you compare it to anything on
STP [2010] - an album some people here don't like, but from a sound quality and production angle sounds pretty damn good compared to the other middle-releases from the catalog.
I think No. 4 got hit by loudness enhancement but something else was going on there when all of the layering sounds like the components to a track are competing with each other - for example you hear more tinniness from cymbal resonance than drum beat. I'm no expert either - I'm just trying to find the combination of words to describe what I've been listening to now for 30 years.